External exposure
What is reachable? Which assets, services and relationships make up the attack surface?
Explore coverage ↗ OFFENSIVE SECURITY, REBUILT FOR THE AI ERA
Find the way in.
Before they do.
Autonomous red-team agents work in concert to uncover real attack paths. Human security specialists direct the mission. Your team gets proof, priorities and a verified way forward.
01CONTROLLED TESTING
02EVIDENCE-LED FINDINGS
03HUMAN ACCOUNTABILITY
ILLUSTRATIVE ATTACK-PATH SIMULATIONS0 / 01
GRID / 001.035
AUTHORIZED SCOPE ONLY // DEMONSTRATION
Potential route Validated step
PATH READY / EXAMPLE DATA
Select a node to inspect the attack path, or play the sample sequence.
STEPS 00 / 04
ATTACK SURFACE / VALIDATED IMPACT / REMEDIATION / RE-TESTSCROLL TO EXPLORE ↓
01 / THE PROBLEMTHE EXPOSURE GAP
More alerts.
Still no answer.
Traditional tools tell you where a weakness might exist. Real attackers combine small openings into a path to what matters.
Strike0 is designed around a sharper question: what can an adversary actually reach, and what would stop them?
The strike0 method ↗01 / DISCOVER
See the exposed surface.
Map the systems, identities and connections within the agreed scope.
02 / PROVE
Test plausible paths.
Use controlled, authorized exercises to distinguish exploitable risk from theoretical noise.
03 / CLOSE
Verify the actual fix.
Give teams clear evidence, recommended actions and a retest against the original path.
02 / ATTACK-PATH INTELLIGENCEFROM SIGNAL TO EVIDENCE
Not another list.
The whole chain.
A sample case file shows how a series of ordinary exposures can create one material business risk. Every element below is fictional.
EXAMPLE CASE FILES0-DEMO-017
A path to privileged access.
Select each stage to see the evidence a security team would expect in a real engagement.
Sample scenario. No live customer data, no operational exploit instructions.01
OBSERVATIONAn internet-facing entry point.
An externally accessible application expands the route into a sensitive workflow. Validation begins with authorized, production-conscious checks.
Affected asset, observed access conditions and reproducible, redacted traces.
Confirm intended exposure, restrict access and re-test within scope.
STRIKE0 / EVIDENCE BEFORE OPINIONDEMO DATA ONLY
03 / THE OPERATING SYSTEMMULTIPLE AGENTS. ONE MISSION.
One mission.
Many specialists.
Autonomous agents can explore separate hypotheses in parallel. Security operators set the objectives, control the boundaries and review material outcomes.
Applications & APIs
How could application logic, authentication and connected services combine into a business-impacting path?
Explore coverage ↗Cloud & identity
Where do weak permissions and trust relationships create unintended access?
Explore coverage ↗AI systems & agents
Assess prompt boundaries, tools, permissions and agent workflows as the attack surface evolves.
Explore coverage ↗Coverage categories represent the proposed strike0 offer and require operational validation before commercial launch.
04 / HUMAN ACCOUNTABILITYMachine scale.
Machine scale.
Human judgment.
Security is not a volume game. Autonomous execution needs the judgment to know what to test, when to stop and what matters.
01Pre-agreed scope and rules of engagement
02Operator oversight and escalation thresholds
03Auditable findings with an accountable reviewer
05 / START WITH ONE MISSIONHOW TO ENGAGE
Start with the system
that matters most.
01 / ASSESS
Focused assessment
A defined critical system, application or business process. Establish the first set of verified attack paths.
Discuss a pilot ↗02 / CONTINUE
Continuous validation
Recurring testing around the agreed attack surface, with risk prioritization and revalidation after fixes.
Explore a program ↗03 / SCALE
Enterprise missions
Coordinated programs across teams and environments, with tailored governance, reporting and approval controls.
Talk to a specialist ↗Commercial packages and service availability are illustrative pending operational and legal review. Pricing is scoped, not published.
03 / ECONOMICS OF EXPOSUREPUBLIC INCIDENT DATA
THE ATTACKER DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR INDUSTRYReal incidents.
Real incidents.
Real balance-sheet consequences.
From compromised digital assets to halted supply chains and fraudulent payments, the cost of an attack travels far beyond the initial vulnerability. Every figure links to published evidence.
2026 / DIGITAL ASSET THEFT01
BINANCE
$6.34BGross value impacted in the October 2026 hot-wallet incident. Not the final net loss.
Inspect the evidence →2024 / RESPONSE + DISRUPTION02
CHANGE HEALTHCARE
$2.2BDirect response costs recorded by UnitedHealth Group for 2024; business-disruption impacts separate.
Inspect the evidence →2024 / PAYMENT DIVERSION03
ARUP
HK$200MTransferred after deepfake-enabled impersonation of leadership in a fraudulent payment process.
Inspect the evidence →i
These amounts measure different things and are not additive. strike0 is not affiliated with these organizations, and these are public case studies, not strike0 client claims.
Explore all incidents →FIRST MOVE / STRIKE0Know where you stand.
Request an assessment ↗